Home Affiliations Members Statutes Resources NomenclatorPublications Subcommissions Meetings Links Courses Login

Conservation_of_Bipolaris_Shoeer_Cochliobolus_Drechsler_1934_1.jpgConservation_of_Bipolaris_Shoeer_Cochliobolus_Drechsler_1934_2.jpgConservation_of_Bipolaris_Shoeer_Cochliobolus_Drechsler_1934_3.jpg

Discussion of Bipolaris vs. Cochliobolus

Posted by Andy on
Dear Participants,

Don't be afraid to leave some feedback for discussion. You are the guinea pigs helping me test this new system... ;o)

Best,
Andy
Posted by Takayuki AOKI on
Thanks for your effort.
I prefer to conserve Bipolaris over Cochliobolus based on consideration of possible name changes of them.

Regards,
Tajayuki
Posted by Mercedes on
I prefer the name Bipolaris over Cochliobolus because it represents the way that it is found in nature, and it is an easier name too.
Posted by Norma on
I prefer to continue using the name Bipolaris over Cochliobolus. Bipolaris is the form usually found in nature.
Posted by Andrea I. Romero on
All the arguments pro to Bipolaris seem reasonable to me. Bipolaris it is frequently found in nature, less changes and it has been frequently used by plantpathologists.
Andrea
Posted by Birgitte Andersen on
Bipolaris is what I see in my petri dishes and therefore prefferable to me.
Leave a Reply



(Your email will not be publicly displayed.)


Captcha Code

Click the image to see another captcha.


Which genus do you prefer?
Bipolaris
Cochliobolus


Creative Commons LicenseThis work by International Commission on the Taxonomy of Fungi is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 3.0 Unported License.